Kaufman & Forman, P.C.
Call to arrange a consultation
678-957-7769 | 800-461-5864
Contact Us
practice areas

NYC is first city to provide protections to black employees’ hair

The New York City Commission on Human Rights has now issued new legal guidance regarding black people’s hair. According to local news, employers as well as gyms, libraries, school and nightclubs cannot force people to change their natural hair as a requirement for being admitted or retain affiliation. The determination went on to say that natural black hair has nothing to do with “professionalism” or “neatness,” which seems in direct contrast to the Alabama women who refused to cut or change her dreadlocks for a new job. In the latter case, the Supreme Court refused to hear the case, essentially saying that employers could do this.

Mayors wife weighs in

NYC’s first lady, Chirlane McCray, also spoke out in support of new guidance. McCray, who is African-American women who weaves her hair, said in a statement that, “Bias against the curly textured hair of African descent is as old as this country and a form of race-based discrimination.” McCray and husband Bill De Blasio’s son Dante is famous for his large afro.

This guidance comes in light of a high school wrestler in New Jersey who was forced to forfeit his match because he refused to cut his dreadlocks. The NYC Commission on Human Rights is currently investigating other cases of natural hairstyle discrimination, such as forcing the employees to wear their braided hair up or fired for wearing it down.

Employers need to have a policy for hair

Even Forbes magazine has weighed in on the issue of employee hair. The general upshot for employers who are concerned about employee appearance is to have clearly defined employee guidelines. For example:

  • Avoid “neat” or “well-kept”: These terms are outdated. Avoid language that is vague, and outline clear expectations about look, design or color.
  • Have a rationale: There should be clear reasons for why there are grooming or appearance policies.
  • Be open to change: employers should ask themselves whether appearance or hairstyle impedes the employee’s ability to do their job. If the answer is no, then it may be time to reevaluate that policy rather than simply not enforcing it.

Loaded terms

Ambiguity in judgment and enforcement can lead to confusion and serious legal issues for business. Working with an employment law attorney can be a tremendous help in avoid employment law litigation or arbitration.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Kaufman & Forman, P.C. Now

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

get Legal Help Now

Kaufman & Forman, P.C.
8215 Roswell Road
Building 800
Atlanta, GA 30350

Phone: 770-390-9200
Fax: 770-395-6720
Atlanta Law Office Map

Review Us

Robert Kaufman has been selected as a 2013 Top Rated Lawyer in ‘Commercial Litigation’ as will be published in the May issue of The American Lawyer & Corporate Counsel magazine.Alex Kaufman has been selected as a 2013 Top Rated Lawyer in ‘Commercial Litigation’ as will be published in the December issue of The American Lawyer & Corporate Counsel magazine.

*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards.